Help Contribute: 2011 Survey
More »
Validation of transit path-building two different types of tests. The first is a manual review of modeled best transit paths for reasonability. This can be a long and tedious process and requires someone with a knowledge of the transit system.
The second commonly used approach is to assign an observed transit trip table from a recent on-board survey and compare the modeled numbers of boardings for the region, by mode, and by line or line group to observed boardings.
A recent innovative approach builds from the current state-of-the-practice of assigning an observed trip table and comparing total boardings by line. The innovative practice takes advantage of information regarding the numbers of boardings reported by individual travelers responding to the on-board survey. Modeled boardings for specific interchanges reported by the individual travelers are then compared to the reported boardings by those travelers and prediction-success tables are constructed. An application of this process has reported that modeled numbers of boardings for individual trips matched the reported boardings for approximately two-thirds of the travelers included in the survey data (see proceedings from 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference).
Since transit assignment is based on minimum impedance transit paths, there is normally full consistency between the parameters used for transit path-building (required for mode choice model application) and parameters used for transit assignment. Consistency should also be maintained between the transit path-building parameters and estimated mode choice model parameters.
In order to properly validate a transit model, adequate independently collected data on transit travel should be available. In other words, the data used for travel model validation should not be the same data used to estimate the travel model. Examples of independently collected data include transit line boarding and alighting counts and on-board survey data. Validation data should be “current.” A good suggestion is that the data be less than four years old.
Other Resources